Advocacy is resistance: Navigating anti-LGBTQI+ violence in post-war Guatemala May 23, 2024 | Read more
Canadian coalition calls for urgent action to uphold civil liberties and Charter rights at protests and encampments across the country May 15, 2024 | Read more
Inter Pares joins call for Burma to end use of violence and respect democracy Feb 4, 2021 | Read more
Planning is resistance: Indigenous people in Burma envision a self-determined future May 23, 2024 | Read more
Inter Pares welcomes Canada’s feminist realignment of international assistance Jun 9, 2017 | Read more
Stopping the unstoppable: Citizen resistance to exterminator technology in Burkina Faso Sep 4, 2019 | Read more
The Immigrant Workers Centre to receive 2018 Peter Gillespie Social Justice Award Apr 18, 2018 | Read more
“Until We Find Them”: Searching for missing loved ones on the road to the North Mar 11, 2019 | Read more
CALL FOR PARTICIPANTS | Inter Pares and SUWRA launch Canadian civil society working group on Sudan Jun 25, 2024 | Read more
Karate and bodily autonomy: Helping girls in Bangladesh thrive through sport Dec 15, 2022 | Read more
Planning is resistance: Indigenous people in Burma envision a self-determined future May 23, 2024 | Read more
Advocacy is resistance: Navigating anti-LGBTQI+ violence in post-war Guatemala May 23, 2024 | Read more
Advocacy is resistance: Navigating anti-LGBTQI+ violence in post-war Guatemala May 23, 2024 | Read more
Joint statement on violence against the Rohingya in Myanmar news : In the News September 26, 2017 Share Print Displaced Rohingya fleeing violence: Taung Paw Camp in Rakhine State – Myanmar Credit: Foreign & Commonwealth Office, https://www.flickr.com/photos/foreignoffice/8280608775 The below-named Canadian civil society organizations and individuals, who all have a strong interest and/or long experience of working in the Asia-Pacific region, are gravely concerned regarding the latest wave of military violence against Rohingya civilians in northwestern Myanmar. The Myanmar military is inflicting collective, disproportionate and illegal punishment on Rohingya civilians following attacks against several police and military installations on August 25, 2017 by the Arakan Rohingya Salvation Army. These attacks were used as an excuse for the army to systematically attack and burn Rohingya villages, raping and murdering civilians in the process. This latest violence follows attacks in October 2016, when the military attacked dozens of villages, killing an untold number and displacing more than 80,000 people. Now hundreds of thousands more have been displaced. The UN Refugee Agency estimates that since August 25, 2017, about 410,000 Rohingya Muslims have fled violence in their native Myanmar for refugee camps in Bangladesh. A number of fellow Nobel peace laureates have called on Aung San Suu Kyi to condemn the violence and the UN Special Rapporteur on Myanmar has called on her to “step in.” While we appreciate the State Counsellor’s September 18, 2017 condemnation of human rights violations, this condemnation is compromised by her denial of ongoing military and police operations, and the government’s insistence that there is not a mass campaign directed at civilians. Unfortunately the Myanmar government has made no public effort to end the violence – to the contrary, the words and actions of the government have severely aggravated the situation. Moreover, the government has systematically blocked humanitarian aid from reaching the Rohingyas, which may constitute a crime under international law. It has consistently denied all reports of military abuses, and is currently blocking a UN-mandated fact finding team from accessing the region. We are pleased with the Canadian government’s recent announcement of $2.5 million in aid, and encourage Global Affairs to find opportunities to allocate more aid towards needs identified by front-line organizations as the most urgent. We applaud Prime Minister Trudeau’s letter to Aung San Suu Kyi that underscored her moral obligation to help stop the crisis, and Foreign Affairs Minister Freeland’s announcement of planned advocacy at the United Nations General Assembly. To this latter end, we urgently call on the Canadian government to: Use all diplomatic channels, particularly through its Embassy in Yangon, to press and support Daw Aung San Suu Kyi and the government of Myanmar to ensure the cessation of the ongoing hostilities, to protect the human rights of Rohingya people, and denounce the exactions perpetrated by the Myanmar military; Demand that the government of Myanmar provide unimpeded access to the Fact-Finding Mission established in March 2017 by resolution of the UN Human Rights Council; Push for humanitarian access and ensure relief assistance in Rakhine State; Press Myanmar officials to desist their inflammatory rhetoric which is endangering humanitarian workers and empowering the military to continue its campaign against civilians Encourage the use of all possible legal channels – national and international - to bring to justice those responsible for atrocities and human rights abuses; Implement immediate travel bans on all Burma Army leaders attempting to visit Canada; Propose the introduction of a United Nations arms embargo against the Myanmar Military, as a measure to reduce the ongoing violence in Rakhine State and also in Kachin and Shan States; and Encourage and support the Myanmar government to demonstrate its commitment to finding meaningful and lasting solutions to the issues in Rakhine State, including, among others, by applying the recommendations of the Final Report of the Advisory Commission on Rakhine State. We and our organizations will continue to monitor the situation, and urge the Canadian government to continue deepening its action on this worsening humanitarian crisis. The following institutions have endorsed this statement: Associates to Develop Democratic Burma / Euro-Burma Office Burmese Muslim Association Canada Tibet Committee Canadian Collective against Islamophobia Canadian Federation of University Women Canadian Union of Public Employees Development and Peace Initiatives of Change Canada Innerspeak Digital Media Inter Pares International Coalition on Human Rights in the Philippines – Canada International Development and Relief Foundation KAIROS: Canadian Ecumenical Justice Initiatives Lawyers’ Rights Watch Canada Mae Sot Education Project MATCH International Women's Fund MY STORY photo project National Union of Public and General Employees Ontario Committee for Human Rights in the Philippines Partners Relief & Development Canada Peace Brigades International Canada The Primate’s World Relief and Development Fund Project Umbrella Burma The Public Service Alliance of Canada Social Justice Fund Rohingya Association of Canada Steelworkers Humanity Fund South Asia Partnership Canada Unifor Social Justice Fund USC Canada World University Service Canada The following individuals, all of whom have years of experience in working in Myanmar or of acting in solidarity with struggles for human rights and democracy in Myanmar, have endorsed this statement: Milagros Arguelles Brenda Belak Dominique Caouette, Études contemporaines et transdisciplinaires de l’Asie du Sud-Est, Université de Montréal Naima Chowdhury, Women's Leadership and Gender Specialist, COADY International Institute, Saint Francis Xavier University Paul Copeland, C.M. Rod Germaine, founder of the former Just Aid Foundation Fareed Khan, sponsor of Change.org petition to revoke Aung San Suu Kyi's honorary Canadian citizenship Susan Hartley, Rotary Global Peace Scholar Murray Thomson, Co-Founder, Canadian Friends of Burma Nisha Toomey, former board member, Canadian Friends of Burma Paul Turcot, South House Exchange Jody Williams, Nobel peace laureate (1997) and chair of the Nobel Women’s Initiative Learn more Inter Pares' September 7th statement on the crisisLearn more about the Rohingyas' situation Comments (3) Add new comment You must have JavaScript enabled to use this form. Your name Comment * Save Leave this field blank Ba Win 12:14pm, Sep 27, 2017 The suffering of the Rohingya will be not only prolonged but the prevalence of genuine democracy in Burma will be blocked if the world doesn’t understand the complexities of the situation. Kanbawza Win reply Mn shah 10:04am, Sep 28, 2017 Strive to reduce inhuman action against rohingya minority reply Abid Bahar 4:15am, Oct 27, 2017 "Complexities of the situation" in Rakhine state! What complexity? Abid Bahar Kanbawza Win a well known defender of the regime in Burma says, "...democracy in Burma will be blocked if the world doesn’t understand the complexities of the situation." "Complexities of the situation"? What complexity? Research on the history of the Rohingya in Burma shows Rohingya Muslim settlements in the country dates back to centuries. Their presence in Burma was even noted by a Scottish doctor Francis Bucanon in 1799. However the military led Burma now claims the Rohingya as the British time Bengali illegal migrants from Bangladesh. For the sake of argument, lets say Rohingya are British time migrants from Bengal. But lets see, if Rakhines of Cox's Bazar in Bangladesh are British time 17th century settlers and now Bangladeshi full citizens, if Marma (Burma) or Burmese in Bandorbon are also Bangladeshi citizens, when the Chakmas in Rangamati entered Bangladesh from Burma during the 14th century are Bangladeshi citizens, when Tamils, Nepalese and Chinese in Malaysia, Thailand, Indonesia and Singapore settled in those countries during the British period are citizens of those countries, why Rohingya who have been living in Burma even before Burma occupied Arakan in 1784 who even held important positions in Aung San (Suu Kyi's father) and U Nu's government as Ministers and MPs, if not for racism why in 1982 the entire Rohingya people have to be declared by the Military dictator Ne Win as the non citizens of Burma? After much expectations from Suu Kyi by the international community why the so-called democracy icon had not change Ne Win's xenophobic stand against the Rohingya rather she instructed the foreign embassies in Burma not to use the name Rohingya? Why for the first time starting from Suu Kyi, Rohingyas have been banned from even participating in elections and now they are being exterminated enmesh through rape of women, killing of young and children and burning the houses by the army with collaboration from the local Rakhine vigelantees. What is our problem (the international community's) to understand the language of the pro genocide Burmese intellectuals and political leaders suggesting us to understand the "complexities of the situation"? Isn't this language of denial of Rohingya citizenship a sign of Burma still living in the past when minorities were see as subject people. With this mindset, isn't Burma also falling behind the modern standard of what is called citizenship? True, in the words of Maung Zarni, a Burmese scholar, Suu Kyi in alliance with the xenophobic Burmese military is in effect campaigning against the Rohingya for a pure "racecrocy." (Abid Bahar PhD is the author of Burma's Missing Dots- The Emerging Face of Genocide, 2010) reply
Ba Win 12:14pm, Sep 27, 2017 The suffering of the Rohingya will be not only prolonged but the prevalence of genuine democracy in Burma will be blocked if the world doesn’t understand the complexities of the situation. Kanbawza Win reply
Abid Bahar 4:15am, Oct 27, 2017 "Complexities of the situation" in Rakhine state! What complexity? Abid Bahar Kanbawza Win a well known defender of the regime in Burma says, "...democracy in Burma will be blocked if the world doesn’t understand the complexities of the situation." "Complexities of the situation"? What complexity? Research on the history of the Rohingya in Burma shows Rohingya Muslim settlements in the country dates back to centuries. Their presence in Burma was even noted by a Scottish doctor Francis Bucanon in 1799. However the military led Burma now claims the Rohingya as the British time Bengali illegal migrants from Bangladesh. For the sake of argument, lets say Rohingya are British time migrants from Bengal. But lets see, if Rakhines of Cox's Bazar in Bangladesh are British time 17th century settlers and now Bangladeshi full citizens, if Marma (Burma) or Burmese in Bandorbon are also Bangladeshi citizens, when the Chakmas in Rangamati entered Bangladesh from Burma during the 14th century are Bangladeshi citizens, when Tamils, Nepalese and Chinese in Malaysia, Thailand, Indonesia and Singapore settled in those countries during the British period are citizens of those countries, why Rohingya who have been living in Burma even before Burma occupied Arakan in 1784 who even held important positions in Aung San (Suu Kyi's father) and U Nu's government as Ministers and MPs, if not for racism why in 1982 the entire Rohingya people have to be declared by the Military dictator Ne Win as the non citizens of Burma? After much expectations from Suu Kyi by the international community why the so-called democracy icon had not change Ne Win's xenophobic stand against the Rohingya rather she instructed the foreign embassies in Burma not to use the name Rohingya? Why for the first time starting from Suu Kyi, Rohingyas have been banned from even participating in elections and now they are being exterminated enmesh through rape of women, killing of young and children and burning the houses by the army with collaboration from the local Rakhine vigelantees. What is our problem (the international community's) to understand the language of the pro genocide Burmese intellectuals and political leaders suggesting us to understand the "complexities of the situation"? Isn't this language of denial of Rohingya citizenship a sign of Burma still living in the past when minorities were see as subject people. With this mindset, isn't Burma also falling behind the modern standard of what is called citizenship? True, in the words of Maung Zarni, a Burmese scholar, Suu Kyi in alliance with the xenophobic Burmese military is in effect campaigning against the Rohingya for a pure "racecrocy." (Abid Bahar PhD is the author of Burma's Missing Dots- The Emerging Face of Genocide, 2010) reply